From k9radio Fri Sep 30 15:28:59 2005 From: Ronald Fuka I'll save you the time for looking it up. Here it is. It is called the R-S-T report. Readability, Signal strength, & Tone Readability: 1.Unreadable 2.Barely readable; occasional words distinguishable 3.Readable with considerable difficulty 4.Readable with practically no difficulty 5.Perfectly readable Signal Strength 1.Faint; signals barely perceptible 2.Very weak signals 3.Weak signals 4.Fair signals 5.Fairly good signals 6.Good signals 7.Moderately strong signals 8.Strong signals 9.Extremely strong signals Tone ( only used for code) C W 1.extremely rough, hissing note 2.Very rough a.c.note; no trace of musicality 3.Rough, low-pitched a.c. note; slightly musical 4.Rather rough a.c. note; moderately musical 5.Musically modulated note 6.Modulated note; slight trace of whistle 7.Near d.c.note; smooth ripple 8.Good d.c. note; just a trace of ripple 9.Purest d.c. note uncle ron ` From: "john" To: "Ronald Fuka" Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:12 PM Subject: Re: 5x5 and HAM >> -->Yeah 5x5 means signal strength and readability of the signal. >> -->Readability goes 1 to 5, 5 being perfectly readable. >> -->Signal strength 1 to 9, 9 being extremely strong. >> -->Tone 1 t0 9, 9 being purest dc >> -->tone is only used for code, cw. >> -->5x9 signal perfectly readable, extremely strong. >> --> >> --> >> -->> I recall using a term "5x5" in the military to talk about status of >> a system. >> -->> john >> -->> >> -->> >> -->> : "The term five by five refers to the two measures of signal strength >> -->> and readability; it is derived from older HAM radio instruments that >> -->> were scaled from zero to 10 with 10 being the strongest. A five by five >> -->> would be interpreted as 50 percent signal strength and easily readable, >> -->> perhaps with some static or band clutter. A 10 by two would have a >> -->> strong signal, but be broken and hard to understand, while a two by 10 >> -->> would contain a weak signal, but be perfectly clear. A 10 by 10 would >> -->> be very strong and crystal clear." >> -->> >> -->> Glad you asked! >> -->> The word "HAM" was the station call letters of the first amateur >> -->> wireless station operated by some amateurs of the Harvard Radio Club. >> -->> They were ALBERT S. HYMAN, BOB ALMY and POOGIE MURRAY. >> -->> >> -->> At first they called their station "HYMAN-ALMY-MURRAY". Tapping out >> -->> such a long name in code soon became tiresome and called for a >> -->> revision. They changed it to "HY-AL-MU", using the first two letters of >> -->> each of their names. Early in 1901 some confusion resulted between >> -->> signals from amateur wireless station "HYALMU" and a Mexican ship named >> -->> "HYALMO". They then decided to use only the first letter of each name, >> -->> and the station CALL became "HAM". >> -->> I saw this on a few sites but can anyone confirm the story? >> -->> >> -->> ---- >> -->> >> -->> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -->> ** http://tech-meister.com **** http://wagoneers.com ** >> -->> Snohomish, Washington USA - where Jeeps don't rust, they mold >> -->> ** http://freegift.net *** http://greatcom.org/laws/languages.html >> -->> -------------------------------------------------------------------------